Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In the company where I worked before, the team of specialists which handled customer dissatisfaction issues often came up with seemingly brilliant solutions which would initially appear to be key breakthroughs but would later turn out to be no more brilliant than those which had been tried and abandoned before.

Along those lines, let's suppose, someone is working on a big scientific discovery or breakthrough, it's got big hype and everything, but once it is made known to public and its applications are discussed, people notice nothing useful about it and dismiss it as nonconstructive or nonfunctional.

I am interested in knowing if there is a word or phrase to describe the idea.

(Edits made to rephrase some sentences)

share|improve this question
2  
An example would be that the OPERA experiment mistakenly reported neutrinos appearing to travel faster than light in 2011. –  user19341 Jan 18 '13 at 5:01
    
I have seen turned out to be a blob used in this context somewhere, don't quite nail it where. –  Mohit Jan 18 '13 at 9:27
1  
disappointment is a good word for anything that doesn't live up to expectations. –  Mr.Mindor Jan 18 '13 at 15:13
2  
For a simple one word response, how about overhyped? –  Mitch Jan 18 '13 at 15:58
add comment

13 Answers 13

up vote 15 down vote accepted

You could also consider the phrase damp squib, which refers to a wet firework that fails to go off, and by extension anything that fails to meet expectations.

share|improve this answer
1  
+1. I have seen it being used in lot of instances. –  Mohit Jan 18 '13 at 9:34
2  
Is this a Briticism? I don't think I've ever heard that phrase in the US, "wet Firecracker" is what I'd expect to hear instead. –  Dan Neely Jan 18 '13 at 14:14
    
+1 and accept. A very interesting phrase. I liked flash in the pan too. –  user32480 Jan 21 '13 at 2:53
add comment

flash in the pan

It's a phrase which goes back to the 17th-18th centuries, when flintlock firearms were discharged in two stages: a small priming charge in an external “pan” was ignited by a spark from the flint, and the resultant flame was supposed to travel through the touch-hole to ignite the main charge, behind the bullet. Often, however the charge in the pan fired but failed to travel, and the result was a misfire – a “flash in the pan”.

The phrase survived long after flintlocks were superseded, and is still in use today, although declining.

share|improve this answer
add comment

One could say it did not live up to the hype

live up to : To prove equal to

hype
1. Excessive publicity and the ensuing commotion: the hype surrounding the murder trial.
2. Exaggerated or extravagant claims made especially in advertising or promotional material "It is pure hype, a gigantic PR job" (Saturday Review).

share|improve this answer
add comment

I would describe this as an illusory breakthrough.

share|improve this answer
4  
Good one. Thinking along the same lines, you could call it a mirage. –  Nathan Reed Jan 18 '13 at 6:42
add comment

In this context you could use the verb fizz out. E.g.:

They claimed to be on the verge of changing the face of genetics, but all the hype soon fizzed out.

According to thesaurus.com, it is synonymous to "fall flat" and "come to nothing".

share|improve this answer
add comment

Fizzle (out):

Verb
End or fail in a weak or disappointing way: "their revolt fizzled out".
Noun
A failure.
Synonyms
verb. fizz - hiss - sizzle
noun. fizz - failure - fiasco - sizzle - flop

share|improve this answer
add comment

The once-pop-culture-permiating phrase "all that glitters is not gold" has a similar connotation: that something that appears valuable or "shiny" on the surface may not have value beneath the surface.

share|improve this answer
    
You mean all that is gold does not glitter — well, or glisten, per Shakespeare. –  tchrist Jan 18 '13 at 12:02
2  
@tchrist Nope...don't think he does. I've heard the former many times, the latter never. I'm guessing you're quite right about the origin, but (in my experience) it has changed. Google has about twice as many hits for "all that glitters is not gold" as well. –  Beska Jan 18 '13 at 13:00
3  
@tchrist That may be the origin of SouthpawHare's phrase; but they don't mean the same thing. His means "not everything that looks valuable is valuable", yours means "not everything that is valuable looks valuable". –  Dan Neely Jan 18 '13 at 14:17
1  
@tchrist - "all that is gold does not glitter" is a Tolkienism; it's part of the poem written by Bilbo about Aragorn. –  Adam V Jan 18 '13 at 15:27
1  
Shakespeare had "All that glisters is not gold". Some editions use glisten or glitters because glister is now archaic. –  Jon Hanna Jan 18 '13 at 16:04
show 1 more comment

Such a discovery could be called a red herring:

...a type of logical fallacy in which a clue is intentionally or unintentionally misleading or distracting from the actual issue. It is also a literary device employed by writers that leads readers or characters towards a false conclusion, often used in mystery or detective fiction.

I think this fits especially well because of the literary usage: when a character in a book encounters a red herring, she may have a similar experience to what you describe—initially thinking a discovery or clue is important, but later finding that it was irrelevant to the truth.

Another possibility is a wild-goose chase: "A futile search, a fruitless errand; a useless and often lengthy pursuit."

share|improve this answer
    
Downvoter, would you mind leaving a comment to say why you downvoted? –  Nathan Reed Jan 19 '13 at 5:05
add comment

Perhaps "a prematurely lauded discovery".

share|improve this answer
add comment

I came across mare's nest here which means 'a much vaunted discovery, which later turns out to be illusory or worthless'. So that's a close contender, too.

share|improve this answer
add comment

In Hollywood, they call this phenomenon a flop.

share|improve this answer
    
A flop doesn't necessarily imply having been hyped in advance, and a movie is not a big scientific discovery, which is what the OP is asking for. –  RegDwigнt Jan 18 '13 at 10:08
1  
You are confusing the OP's example with the main gist in question. In case you hand't noticed all movies are hyped. If there weren't hyped, we wouldn't know about them. BTW, things that go flop, make a sound, because the hype took them so high. –  cxx6xxc Jan 18 '13 at 10:25
1  
The question mentions "a much hyped discovery", "brilliant solutions", "key breakthroughs" and "big scientific discovery or breakthrough" throughout. It's not just an example. It is the very gist of the question. And no, not all movies are hyped. In fact the absence of hype is the reason behind many of the flops. Also, please do not roll back the formatting. –  RegDwigнt Jan 18 '13 at 10:34
add comment

All bark and no bite

According to Wiktionary it is an idiomatic phrase that means 'Full of big talk but lacking action, power, or substance; pretentious.'

share|improve this answer
add comment

Say that it was ahead of its time.

Of course, this is only if you want to be positive about the idea/work/etc, as the implication is not that the idea is bad, just that we just weren't quite ready for it. Basically, it's your fault that you weren't ready for the world changing awesomeness.

For a mini usage demo, cue the Segway.

I still think it's a dumb idea — not just because it's likely to lead to greater misspelling of segue — and would call it a fizzer. It definitely didn't live up to the hype, being an illusory "breakthrough" in personal mobility. However, Segway would say that:

It's ahead of its time

Like any invention that's ahead of its time, the Segway PT is often misunderstood. The gleeful smiles of Segway PT riders may have created an impression that it is ...well...a toy. But make no mistake. While a Segway PT is incredibly fun to ride, it is serious transportation designed for today's world.

(http://www.segway.com/individual/learn-how-works.php)

And I've just noticed I've used an Australian colloquialism:

fizzer n. colloq

  1. a firecracker that fails to explode
  2. a failure; a fisasco

(Macquarie Encyclopedic Dictionary, 1990 ed)

share|improve this answer
    
Not only does "ahead of its time" not imply "bad"; it in fact implies "good", something that turns out as useful, valuable, appreciated, just at a later date. While the OP is expressly asking for something that implies "worthless". Fizz out, fizzle, and fizzle out have already been suggested in two other answers. –  RegDwigнt Jan 18 '13 at 10:13
    
@RegDwight I may need to rewrite the answer to reflect it better, but I thought the segway example would be a case of something fitting the OPs description - it was hyped ahead of time as a breakthrough in personal mobility, but when revealed it fell flat. I'd use the term 'ahead of it's time' sarcastically in this case. –  tanantish Jan 18 '13 at 11:47
    
@RegDwighт Also, re: fizzer. Happy for that to be cut out and merged somewhere else but I wasn't sure if it's best placed next to the answer by Kris, or Prince Goulash. Suggestions? –  tanantish Jan 18 '13 at 11:51
    
This is a common understated 'spin' on a bad situation, so is not ostensibly equivalent to what is asked for. –  Mitch Jan 18 '13 at 15:57
    
@Mitch Yep, I think I was having an off day, and didn't read the question (and post a sane-enough) answer. It's adding noise to the lot so I'll probably set it up for deletion in short order. –  tanantish Jan 19 '13 at 2:48
add comment

protected by RegDwigнt Jan 18 '13 at 10:14

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality answers, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site.

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?