English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Is it correct to say "It was not happened"? I have heard people saying "It was not happening" or "It didn't happen" but "It was not happened" is new to me.

share|improve this question

The past progressive tense uses the past of to be with the present participle: "It was not happening". This tense is to say that something was - or in this case was not - happening continually over a period in the past.

The simple past is most often formed from the preterite form of the verb ("It happened"), but sometimes for emphasis, inversion of - as in this case - negation, it is formed with forms of do: "It didn't happen".

The form "It was not happened" doesn't match any construction for any tense, and is incorrect.

share|improve this answer
Downvoter care to comment? – Jon Hanna Jan 16 '13 at 17:03

It is incorrect to say "It was not happened", because it is against the rules of tense - past tense, in this case.

It could be "It did not happen", in which case it will be simple past.

"It was not happening" is past continuous and differs in meaning from "It did not happen".

Hope the links will be of help to you.

share|improve this answer

The verb “happen” can not take a direct object, and it therefore has no passive form, so there is no “is/was/be happened” tense. There are a number of English verbs like this: occur, arise, and exist are some others. Here’s a link with a short discussion.

share|improve this answer
I think you're on the right path. But unfortunately your assumption that there cannot be a passive if the active version has no direct object is not true. That is, it is not a requirement that the active version have a direct object in order for a passive version to be possible. For example, "These problems weren't faced up to by the committee" and "Not to go would be considered rude". – F.E. Jan 24 '15 at 7:49

protected by Janus Bahs Jacquet Jan 23 '15 at 22:29

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.