Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

There are always these people who are weak and insecure and always looking for people to be dependent on for their security. They never have say in their group and meekly agree to what other is doing even if they don't like it.

share|improve this question

closed as not a real question by FumbleFingers, aedia λ, Hellion, Andrew Leach, MετάEd May 9 '13 at 22:41

It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form. For help clarifying this question so that it can be reopened, visit the help center.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

    
I'd call that person a "leech" or a "parasite" or a "user" for being intentionally dependent, and a "wimp" for a lack of assertiveness. –  user21497 Jan 16 '13 at 8:29
    
There's not really enough context here, but needy, clinging, insecure, sheep-like might be candidates. –  FumbleFingers Jan 16 '13 at 19:19

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

This might be the droid you're looking for: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codependency.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.