Tell me more ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Suppose you enumerate points of some list, adding "check" after each one. How to speak about the reverse of a "check" (i.e. omission or an opposite for the item)?

Like if you have:

  • Big scary horns ☑
  • 180° mounth ☑
  • 50-cm claws ☑
  • Predatory glare ☒

and say

Look there! Such a beast: big scary horns — check; yawning mouth — check; loooong claws — check; predatory glare — _____, hovewer..

Variants that come to mind:

  • "no check"
  • "ex"
  • "miss"
  • "no"
  • "without check"
  • "cross"
share|improve this question
In this context, check just means yes, so the opposite is no. – FumbleFingers Jan 16 at 1:43

4 Answers

up vote 3 down vote accepted

I usually say uncheck in this context.

share|improve this answer

I like:

Predatory glare, negatory.

share|improve this answer
2  
Maybe better "negative"? – Vi0 Jan 16 at 0:52
@Vi0: Sure, but negatory has this military/trucker-slang thing going for it. Depends what you're looking for. – Callithumpian Jan 16 at 0:56
1  
Or maybe Nope – Jim Jan 16 at 1:31

I have used "missing", "unsure", "pending" in such cases. I have also used expletives.

share|improve this answer

The word you select must be strong enough to overcome the assumption by the listener that the characteristic you have just named is present. That is, the listener will have mentally "checked it off" as you say it.

To overcome this tendency, you need to place the negative indicator before the label when speaking. I suggest:

"Look there! Such a beast: big scary horns - check, yawning mouth - check, loooong claws - check; but no predatory glare ....".

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.